Allow me a break from worrying about people, animals, and history for a moment to have a small rant:
Do you think there will be lasting political fallout from this? Americans have short memories when it comes to President Bush. I doubt the Gulf Coast States will forget, and you know, that might actually swing things in the Democrats favor - if they leverage the disaster correctly and tactfully. I have no doubt that those states will still be rebuilding when 2007-8 roll around.
There should be political fallout. There deserves to be political fallout, from the Mayor on up to the President. The federal gov't was clearly not ready to take care of an urban disaster such as this. Apparently, all the Homeland Security we've paid for and heard about only exists to take care of a one-time, localized event, such as 9/11. I"m glad that we're ready to take care of events like that. But did we forget to prepare for Mother Nature? This is not localized. This is a national disaster - it encompasses more than one state. Entire towns have been completely wiped out - removed from the map. FEMA has been virtually nonexistent, according to all reports. FEMA is a part of the Dep't of Homeland Security. They had no trouble at all responding to Jeb Bush's Florida 4 times last year. Why is it so difficult to respond to Mississippi and Louisiana?
I was watching a bit of Scarborough Country on MSNBC tonite (just flipping by and caught it). He was in Biloxi. He and his wife came to Biloxi and were so shocked at the conditions that they went and gathered supplies and came back to distribute food and water. Residents told him, on camera, that the Scarboroughs were the first aide workers they had seen since the hurricane. These people have nothing left - no homes, no food, no water, no cars to leave. Everything was destroyed. FEMA has not been to Biloxi. The residents asked questions along the lines of "Why can we send help to Iraq but we can't help our own people. We're supposed to be the most powerful country on Earth." Good point, and good question. Scarborough was shocked, appalled, and angry - kudos to him. (Interestingly, they don't mention his reaction on their web site.)
Today, far too long after the hurricane hit, the Bush Administration decided to send in troops. New Orleans never should have descended into anarchy and chaos. Rape, murder, looting, starvation ... it never should have been allowed to happen. The hurricane was projected to hit New Orleans. Why weren't federal disaster teams prepared to respond? Prepared to rush in keep the city in order? Prepared to rush in and rescue people with helicopters? Instead, helicopters had to be asked for. Today, doctors from two hospitals in NOLA called the Associated Press out of desperation. They were out of supplies, they had no power, no water, and were trying to keep looters at bay. There was constant promised help from the National Guard, but none ever came. They needed to get their patients to safety. Out of desperation, they issued a cry for help to the Associated Press. Also today, the Mayor of New Orleans, at the Convention Center where there were 7 dead bodies and riotous citizens with guns, issued a plea for help to CNN (also picked up by the BBC and others). He issued a "desperate SOS" to the world.
So tell me, why are these people turning to the media for help? Why isn't their own gov't - our gov't - there to help them? Isn't that part of the President's job description? To give us comfort and to lead the troops.
Ideally, the troops that have finally been ordered to New Orleans will help restore order out of the chaos. And the $10B aid package will help in providing relief. But could so much of this have been prevented if it had been promptly responded to like Florida?
Oh, and don't get me started on how that levee might never have collapsed and flooded New Orleans if the funding for its completion hadn't been diverted to Iraq.
And now, I'm going to go watch something non-news related for a while.